Sunday, May 24, 2015

Institutionalised Police Racism And Brutality Surface Timed To Avoid News Cycle

     This post is way off topic for this blog, but I have posted it as a matter of conscience. It has to do with crimes committed under colour of authority by police in the United States and accessorial conduct by prosecutors, judges, the Congress of the United States, the Department of Justice and the news media. Wanton killings by police in the United States have become more the rule than the exception in America, and most involve the excessive and gratuitously violent use of deadly force. 
     Last night while Tweeting on Twitter I noticed that the number one World Wide Trend was #BreloVerdict. I clicked on it, and then Tweeted the news I'd learned to my roughly 700 Twitter followers: #Breaking #News Policeman Michael Brelo gets away with murdering UNARMED Malissa Williams + Timothy Russell, killed with 137 bullets fired. Note: you'll notice in the image of the actual Tweet below that I initially misspelled "Malissa". I read that the Judge who found the killer cop not guilty had deliberately delayed the verdict until after the holiday weekend rush hour traffic was done, was on friendly terms with the prosecutor and the P.B.A., and used a description of a golf tee shot in reading his verdict.  
     Police in the United States kill many more people than alleged terrorists do, and additionally, police killings have been grossly under-reported. According to this article in The Guardian: Police killed more than twice as many people as reported by US government. They've killed an average of 928 people a year over the last eight years - 928 x 8 = 7,424 killed by police. This Huffington Post article lists American deaths from terrorism between 2009 and 2013 (five years) as 67 (13.4 per year).  928 divided by 13.4 is 69.25. You are more than 69 times more likely to be killed by police than by people the government calls terrorists. 
     The First Amendment guarantees "the right of the people peaceably to assemble , and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances" yet this right was forcibly denied to the peacefull protesters in Cleveland Ohio last night. 
     The Cleveland police, in riot gear, surrounded the peaceful protesters, cutting off all routes of egress. Once they had the protesters "kettled" (trapped) they arrested them for failing to disburse. The surrounding and arresting had obviously been planned in advance. For the most part they forced the press out of the area, although prior to the mass arrests they had also been arresting legal observers and live streaming reporters, including Kris M. Wernowski (@kriswernowsky) managing producer of Cleveland Ohio news. 

     In a "bench trial", Judge John P. O'Donnell ruled policeman Michael Brelo "not guilty" despite the fact that, after more than 100 rounds had been fired, Brelo climbed up on the hood of Russel's car and shot the unarmed Melissa Williams and Timothy Russell through the windshield 15 more times at point blank range. 
     White people, of which I am one, are not generally aware of just how extreme racism and hatred are and can be in America, or perhaps I should call our country "AmeriKKKa". Many decades ago, back in my drinking days, I walked into a bar with someone I worked with who happened to be black. I had been in that bar many times before and never noticed anything unusual. This time I experienced hate stares. 
     Last night on Twitter I was stunned at the number of hateful racist and fascist (literally) Tweets on the #BreloVerdict. timeline. Some were even hawking stuff with swastikas. I BLOCKED a lot of Twitter users who were Tweeting that the unarmed black couple, Malissa Williams and Timothy Russell, had deserved to be shot and killed. 
         I took screen-shots of my own Twitter feed to memorialise some of the Tweets. I Retweeted a lot of people. The Tweets in the screen-shot images below are as they appear in the Twitter feed, with the first at the bottom and the last at the top (first below). 


I agonised over whether to include the following photos or even the descriptions of them because they are very upsetting, but in the end decided the truth is best told by them. 
HERE IS THAT GRAPHIC PHOTOGRAPH Please read the article that accompanied the graphic image of the murdered couple below was taken from: An article titled "Graphic Photo Depicting Brelo's Crime | Cop Block" by Deo Odolecki. It gives the following credit for the photo and text:  
"This photo along with this description was found on Facebook Posted by Former East Cleveland Mayor, Eric Jonathan Brewer". Here is the URL for the photo itself: the disturbing graphic photo of Malissa Williams' and Timothy Russell's bullet riddled bodies and HERE IS THAT UPSETTING GRAPHIC IMAGE 
This image is listed as "Photo: Unacredited / Associated Press" and is from the article titled: "Trial to start for lone officer charged in Cleveland chase, killings - SFGate ":

 I  especially want to  thank Kizzy Von Doll of the fashion, art, beauty and lifestyle blog The Dainty Dolls House from Scotland, UK, Twitter @DaintyDollHouse and YouTube Kizzy Von Doll's channel for Retweeting so many of my Tweets about the murders of  at the hands of the Cleveland Police.

I'd like to say A HUGE THANK YOU to all of the following Fbloggers Bbloggers and Lbloggers who took the time to leave comments on my last post titled "THANK YOU 2014 Commenters, Bbloggers Beauty and Makeup Haul, No Pants Subway Ride 2015".
Miss Caitlin S. of Candyfloss and Persie and Twitter @CaitieLady08;
The hard-working (multiple jobs) fashion blogger and online marketing intern Ina R. a.k.a. Carina of Bad Taste Toast from Düsseldorf, Germany who moved to Perth, Australia in October of 2014 (three comments!!!);
The beautiful Camila Faria of Não Me Mande Flores Twitter @_CamilaF_;
Fashion blogger, fashionista editor and yoga/pilate instructor Couture Carrie of CC Loves, of Couture Carrie, and of Bikinis and Martinis Twitter @CoutureCarrie. Carrie loves spotting and sharing fashion trends and style with her readers; 
The fashionista Fblogger, commerce accounting and law graduate from Sydney, Australia, lover of kitty cats, unicorns, polka dots, bows, pearls pretty dresses, sparkly cardigans and anything girly - Imogen of the blog Tia_Cherie and now vlogging on her new Tia Cherie - YouTube channel. Imogen recently uploaded  YouTube videos titled "Monthly Beauty Favourites - December 2014 - YouTube", "H+M: Haul and First Impressions - January 2015 - YouTube", and "OOTD: By the Waterside + Ferry Ride - February 2015 - YouTube"; 
The horse riding, art, literature, ballet and poetry loving sex education blogger Anna Louise, the author of the sexy (Blogger Content Warning) blog "Welcome to Anna's Place";  
The pretty and popular fashion blogger from Poland Ania Zarzycka of the fashion blog Fashion with blog photos taken by her sister Klaudia;  
Justyna T from Poland of the blog JTERE and Tumblr j.tere
Celyn PS a.k.a. Life's a Shoe from the Philippines of the blogs Style and Chocolates, and Life Is A Shoe, Twitter @CelynPS Celyn PS's YouTube channel where she uploaded the video pandanun pabadlong harlem shake - YouTube;   
Jamie Rose D. from Georgia, USA of the fashion and beauty blog Petite Panoply, Twitter @PetitePanoply and Petite Panoply's YouTube channel. I enjoyed watching her outfit video Summer Outfit: Galaxy Skirt + a Polka Dot Crop Top! - YouTube;  
Beautiful fashion and lifestyle blogger from the Philippines Vanessa Mercado of Voguely Van and Twitter  @VoguelyVan of Voguely Van: Blues Clues 
Oliwia Nicz of BLOG017 and video blogging at Oliwia Nicz YouTube channel
The poetic always inspiring dancing phenomenon RaeAbigael of RAELLARINA - The Ballerina on Fire Twitter @RaeAbigael;  and Raellarina's Channel - YouTube;  
The French fashionista Jeanne, lovely author of the sartorial blog Fashion Musings Diary and Twitter @FashionMusingsD
Diana Cloudlet Russian blogger and fashion lover of the blog Diana Cloudlet;  
Fashionista, DIY and thrifting inspired blogger from the Door peninsula of Wisconsin Indy of The Fabulosity Factor Twitter @Fab_Factor;
Tasha of the U.K. fashion and beauty blog xBeYOUtifulx 
Jessica Founder and fashion blogger of the blog What To Style and Twitter @JessLouvain  
Ann of the blogs Mom's Turf and Rooms of Inspiration
Fashion beauty and lifestyle blogger from Jakarta Indonesia Winda Octavia of the blog W.I.N.D.A. Wish  Imagination and Dreams Allowed, Twitter @pure_win ,and Winda Octavia - YouTube;  
Seattle Washington Fashion blogger Tina Phan of the blog Just A Tina Bit Twitter @JustATinaBit
Kizzy Von Doll of the fashion, art, beauty and lifestyle blog The Dainty Dolls House from Scotland, UK, Twitter @DaintyDollHouse and YouTube Kizzy Von Doll's channel;  
Jeanne Christine, a lovely, young, recently engaged "Fil-Chi, twenty-something girl, born and raised in Cebu, Philippines, but now based in Adelaide, Australia" blogging about "happy-happy-joy-joy aspects" of life, including fashion travel and food at her blog Jeanne in a Bottle;   

Sony Mingoss from Spain of the blog TRèS ChIC. who loves and blogs about the world of beauty and fashion. I tried Google translate on her comment and got: "Hi Is beautiful, I just want us to let us know by GFC? I love, I hope at: 

Here are a few other places you can find me on the internet:
Mister Panty Buns's channel on YouTube at;
My Twitter @Panty_Buns;
PantyBuns on BuzzFeed;;;
my (Panty_Buns) account on Photobucket
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO INCLUDE LINKS to your fashion, beauty and lifestyle blogs WITH YOUR COMMENTS BELOW.
I love reading your comments, checking out your blogs, youtube channels and Tweets on Twitter.


Wednesday, January 14, 2015

THANK YOU 2014 Commenters, Bbloggers Beauty and Makeup Haul, No Pants Subway Ride 2015

After not doing a blog post since early August, I've finally gotten around to doing another post. It's way too wordy and long and should have been FOUR posts instead of lumping them together as one: A thank you to commenters, a makeup and cosmetics haul, a lingerie fashion OOTD and review recap for the year 2014, and the 14th annual No Pants Subway Ride 2015. I included a few makeup and outfit questions further down, and there are a couple of photos and embedded YouTube videos.
     First of all, THANK YOU to all the fashion, beauty and lifestyle bloggers who commented on any of the blog posts I did in the year 2014! I am very grateful, love reading what you wrote, and tried to include your links below in the thanks for your comments on any or each of the posts I did in the year 2014 (only nine posts), so many of you will find your own links listed below more than once. My sincerest apologies if you were left out if I mangled your name info or links.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS on my 5th of August 2014 post titled "Thank You To Commenters, Rant On Discriminatory Social Media Censorship and YouTube Slander " TO:
Fashion blogger, fashionista editor and yoga/pilate instructor Couture Carrie of CC Loves, of Couture Carrie, and of Bikinis and Martinis Twitter @CoutureCarrie. Carrie loves spotting and sharing fashion trends and style with her readers;
The beautiful Camila Faria of Não Me Mande Flores Twitter @_CamilaF_;
The pretty and popular fashion blogger from Poland Ania Zarzycka of the fashion blog Fashion with blog photos taken by her sister Klaudia;
The French fashionista Jeanne, lovely author of the sartorial blog Fashion Musings Diary and Twitter @FashionMusingsD ;
The hard-working (multiple jobs) fashion blogger and online marketing intern Ina R. a.k.a. Carina of Bad Taste Toast from Düsseldorf, Germany who recently (Oct. 2014) moved to Australia;
The poetic, inspiring, dancing phenomenon RaeAbigael of RAELLARINA- The Ballerina on Fire and Raellarina's Channel - YouTube and Twitter @RaeAbigael;
Lifestyle and vintage fashion blogger, rescue diver  Frocktasia a.k.a. Jennie Mcletchie, made in Sweden and vintage fashionista blogger of the blog FROCKTASIA, Twitter @FROCKTASIA  YouTube FROCKTASIA on YouTube and with her husband Mark Mcletchie (YouTube) link, curators of beautiful vintage frocks available at FROCKTASIA on Etsy and at vintage fairs.
Shopaholic and Chaviori.
Debora Micucci of Catwalk's Roar  and YouTube channel (no videos yet);
Fashionista, DIY and thrifting inspired blogger from the Door peninsula of Wisconsin Indy of The Fabulosity Factor Twitter @Fab_Factor and YouTube ;
Recently married fashion beauty and lifestyle blogger from Portland, Oregon Miss Caitlin S. of the blog Candyfloss + Persie Twitter @CaitieLady08

Fashion style and beauty blogger, word lover and muse one inspiration at a time Cheryl van den Berg (Oh to Be a Muse) of the Fbloggers Bbloggers blog Oh to Be a Muse, Twitter @OhtoBeaMuse, and Cheryl van den Berg (Oh to Be a Muse) YouTube;  
Fashionista, Beauty Blogger and diplomate in tourism, from the Canary Islands, Spain, Sara of the blog My Petite Corner Twitter @saracabigl and YouTube Sara Cabeza's Channel/videos;

THANK YOU FOR COMMENTS on my 6th of May, 2014 post titled: "Shadowline and Victorias Secret Lingerie Fashion OOTDs and Reviews with Dressing Room Selfie Photos and Video with Blooper " TO:
Couture Carrie of CC Loves, of Couture Carrie, and of Bikinis and Martinis and Twitter @CoutureCarrie;
Indy of The Fabulosity Factor and Twitter @Fab_Factor;
RaeAbigael of the blog RAELLARINA- The Ballerina on Fire, Raellarina's Channel - YouTube and Twitter @RaeAbigael;
Camila Faria of the blog Não Me Mande Flores and Twitter @_CamilaF_
Ania Zarzycka of the blog Fashion;
Bernadeth G. of the blog Miss Beatrix
Vix of the blog Vintage Vixen, Twitter @Vintage_Vix66, YouTube Vix Brearley, and curator (with Jon) at Kinky Mellon's Retro Boutique;
Peet and her blogging dog Leos, a.k.a. Mister Fartz of the blog For Peet's Sake and Twitter @4PeetsSake;
Tara Twitter @Englishian and Jade Twitter @Girlyougotstyle  both of the blog THE STYLE RAWR! Twitter   @TheStyleRawr;
Malibu Mara of the blog .Malibu Mara. YouTube MalibuMaraTV and Twitter @MalibuMara (Mara left her comment related to my Victoria's Secret/Shadowline post in the comments to my post titled: "Fbloggers Lingerie Fashion OOTDs and Reviews of Vanity Fair Ravissant Full Briefs".

THANK YOU FOR COMMENTS on my 13th of April 2014 Post titled "Bali Skimp Skamp Briefs and Warner's Modern Briefs Reviews" TO:
Couture Carrie of CC Loves, of Couture Carrie, and of Bikinis and Martinis and Twitter @CoutureCarrie;
Jade & Tara of the UK fashion and style blog THE STYLE RAWR! Twitter @TheStyleRawr;
Camila Faria of the blog Não Me Mande Flores Twitter @_CamilaF_ (twice!) ;
Ania Zarzycka of the blog Fashion;
Shana Emily of the blog ColorBlind YouTube Shana Emily's channel and Twitter @ShanaEmily;
gabusiek of Gabusiek bloguje
Imogen of the blog Tia_Cherie;
RaeAbigael of the blog RAELLARINA- The Ballerina on Fire and Raellarina's Channel - YouTube and Twitter @RaeAbigael
Miss Caitlin S. of Candyfloss and Persie and Twitter @CaitieLady08;
Vix of Vintage Vixen, Twitter @Vintage_Vix66, YouTube Vix Brearley;
Ina R. a.k.a. Carina from Dusseldorf, Germany but currently in Perth, Australia of the blog BadTasteToast;
MalibuMara of the blog .MalibuMara., YouTube Malibu Mara TV and Twitter @MalibuMara
Corinne of, Twitter @skinnedcartree and YouTube Corinne C.  at;
Peet of the blog For Peet's Sake and Twitter @4PeetsSake

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS on my 3rd of April, 2014 post titled "Fbloggers Lingerie Fashion OOTDs and Reviews of Vanity Fair Ravissant Full Briefs"  TO:
Vix of Vintage Vixen, Twitter @Vintage_Vix66, YouTube Vix Brearley;
Couture Carrie of CC Loves, of Couture Carrie, and of Bikinis and Martinis Twitter @CoutureCarrie;
Ania Zarzycka of the fashion blog Fashion with blog photos taken by her sister Klaudia;
RaeAbigael of RAELLARINA- The Ballerina on Fire and Twitter @RaeAbigael;
Peet  of the blog For Peet's Sake and Twitter @4PeetsSake;
Camila Faria of Não Me Mande Flores Twitter @_CamilaF_;
Imogen of Tia_Cherie and Tia Cherie - YouTube channel;

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS on my 4th of March 2014 post titled "Lingerie Fashion OOTD and Review of Carole Nylon Full Briefs with ros+ALI Daisy Print Poncho" TO:
Couture Carrie of  CC Loves and Couture Carrie Twitter @CoutureCarrie (twice);
 Corinne of, Twitter @skinnedcartree and YouTube Corinne C.  at;
Camila Faria of Não Me Mande Flores Twitter @_CamilaF_;
Vix of Vintage Vixen, Twitter @Vintage_Vix66 and YouTube Vix Brearley;
Ania Zarzycka of Fashion;
SPRFRK of SUPERFREAK Twitter @kirstenthyra;
Shana Emily of ColorBlind, Shana Emily YouTube and Twitter @ShanaEmily;
RaeAbigael of RAELLARINA- The Ballerina on Fire and Twitter @RaeAbigael
Imogen of the blog Tia_Cherie
Jade and Tara of Twitter @TheStyleRawr;
Danielle Lopez of Danielle's Ramblings.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS on my 2nd of February, 2014 post titled "Lbloggers Fbloggers OOTD and Review of Elomi Valentina Heart-Print Nylon Briefs" TO:
Couture Carrie of  CC Loves and Couture Carrie Twitter @CoutureCarrie;

Camila Faria of Não Me Mande Flores Twitter @_CamilaF_;
Peet of For Peet's Sake Twitter @4PeetsSake;

ColorBlind, YouTube Shana Emily's channel, and Twitter @ShanaEmily;
Jade & Tara of The Style Rawr Twitter @TheStyleRawr;
 Corinne of (twice!), Twitter @skinnedcartree and YouTube Corinne C at;
Imogen of Tia_Cherie;
Vix of Vintage Vixen, Twitter @Vintage_Vix66 and YouTube Vix Brearley.
There were two other blouse and panty outfit of the day and lingerie reviews that I had posted only one day earlier, on the 1st of February, 2014, neither of which received any comments. Those two posts were titled: "Lbloggers Fbloggers OOTD and Review of Maidenform Flexees Shapewear Panty Briefs" and "Lbloggers Fbloggers OOTD and Review of Rago Shapewear Panty Brief with Lace". I have since refrained from doing posts that are unexpectedly close together since my followers have come to expect less than one post per month by me.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS on my 3rd of January, 2014 post titled "Lbloggers Fbloggers OOTD and Review of Shimera Seamless Full Briefs" TO:
Couture Carrie of  CC Loves;
Tina Stefanovic of Style Sinners blogspot;
Imogen of Tia_Cherie;
Peet of For Peet's Sake (twice);
Camila Faria of Não Me Mande Flores;
Patti Santamaría of Shoes & Basics;
Liezel Aldecoa of Fashion Fabulosity;
Ania Zarzycka of Fashion;
RaeAbigael of RAELLARINA- The Ballerina on Fire;
Corinne of, and;
Vix of Vintage Vixen.
An additional THANK YOU to all of the other fashionistas who have been so kind as to leave comment on posts in prior years as well!

Here are a few of the things I've neglected to blog about in 2014 and 2015:
In addition to all the blouse and panty fashion hauls and OOTDs I've neglected to photograph, take videos of, try on, model and review, some of which I mentioned in my last post, I haven't blogged about the Essentials The Master Set from e.l.f. Cosmetics:

The photo above doesn't do the set justice nor does the image on the e.l.f. EyesLipsFace website's page for the set. It's a HUGE 150 piece set. Two of the things I love about elf EyesLipsFace makeup and cosmetics is that they're vegan and PETA approved cruelty free - and I think the prices are quite reasonable.
     Some of the other Makeup brands I'm interested in besides elf EyesLipsFace are Urban Decay, Obsessive Compulsive Cosmetics, Sephora, and Concrete Minerals.
There are articles on Cruelty-Free Beauty and Cosmetics by PETA on their site.  
A few questions:
Have you ever tried elf EyesLipsFace brand makeup or any of the other brands with vegan cruelty free products I listed above? If so, which are your favourites?

A briefs bit about the 14th Annual NO PANTS SUBWAY RIDE 2015:
On the 11th of January 2015, thousands of people in countries around the world once again took off their skirts and trousers, riding subways and trains with their underwear showing for the 14th Annual No Pants Subway Ride. Originally organized by Improv Everywhere, the event has been growing every year and garnered the attention of many television news stations. Although the news coverage has been considerable, there hasn't been much in the way of on-air underwear / lingerie fashion reviews of the briefs, bikinis and boxers on display.
      The post-New York City N.P.S.R. meet-up and after party was scheduled to last from 4:15 PM - 11:30 PM and commenced near 35 East 13th St. Union Square and then inside Bar 13, where there was a cover charge of $10 cover and identification required showing 21 years old plus. Outside at Union Square there were television news crews set up ready to make stars out of some No Pants Subway Riders who were there in their undies.

    The coverage on Twitter by Allie Yang ( of WPIX-TV (@PIX11News on Twitter) was excellent. She covered the event starting at the meet-up point in Foley Square, NYC andTweeted out 26 photos via her Twitter media: Photos and videos by Allie Yang (@allieallieooop | Twitter), including this four photo collage titled: this four photo collage titled: "#NPSR @PIX11News #butts"
     Here is a link to an article posted on the web titled: "New Yorkers drop their pants for annual No Pants Subway Ride" by New York's PIX11 / WPIX-TV. It features a video of Magee Hickey broadcasting live from Union Square and a gallery of 13 photos.

     Stacey Delikat of MyFoxNY Tweeted only two rather tame photos on her Twitter Media - Photos and videos by Stacey Delikat (@StaceyDelikat) | Twitter, but she too reported live from Union Square (fully dressed). It was her second year reporting on the annual event. Here's the article on the 14th annial No Pants Subway Ride with photo gallery and video.
     NBC TV's coverage of the New York City No Pants Subway Ride was lacking or impinged upon by their early talk about the imminent red carpet appearances of celebrities for the Golden Globes which was scheduled to be on NBC later that evening.
     The Telegraph posted a gallery of pictures from The 14th annual No Pants Subway Ride as did the Daily Mail Online in their article titled: "Subway riders in New York join thousands to celebrate 'No Pants Day Subway Ride'".
     It's unbelievable that I managed to chicken out of so many "No Pants" events considering the scads of photos and videos of myself male modeling and reviewing full briefs that I've published and released on this blog and on my YouTube channel. I knew enough in advance that I could have taken a taxi to the nearest (Queens, NY) meet-up location at the Unisphere in Flushing Meadow Park at Sunday Jan. 11th at 3 PM - so many lame excuses for not participating.
     Additionally I've failed to take any new haul and outfit photos for new posts on this blog yet this year or to make and upload any new lingerie review videos to my YouTube channel at If and when I do, if my Twitter (@Panty_Buns) is working, I'll Tweet that I've done so.
     Which pair of full brief panties do you like the best out of the blouse and panty hauls and outfits I both styled on this blog and reviewed and male-modeled in the customer lingerie review videos I uploaded to my YouTube channel?
     Note: Two of my videos were false flagged were censored and removed and the view counts occasionally go backwards on the featured video, and many require signing in to watch :(


LINK: Mister Panty Buns's YouTube videos

LINK: Mister Panty Buns's Popular videos Playlist - YouTube
I had been considering wearing either the Warners Vintage Pink Nylon Full Briefs (YouTube video), the Bali Tender Bud Print Skimp Skamp Full Brief Panties(YouTube video), the VF Lingerie minifloral nylon full briefs(YouTube video) or possibly the Hanes Her Way Women's Nylon Full Briefs (restricted YouTube video with artificially reduced view-count). 

     I've put on weight and presently weigh over 95 kilos and am getting really old.
Do you think I should I participate in an underwear-in-public event anyway?
If someday I don't manage to chicken out, which pair of full brief panties do you think I should wear and which should I have  worn to the "No Pants Subway Ride"? Solid colour briefs or print?
    There were a lot of videos posted of the no skirt or trousers events that took place in cities around the world. You check out some of the undies that people who actually participated in the ride and after-party were wearing in the following screenshot and YouTube video embeds by Improv Everywhere and by the New York Daily news:
Screenshot: img-No_Pants_Subway_Ride_2015-Improv_Everywhere.jpg


No Pants Subway Ride 2015 | Improv Everywhere -YouTube

New York City's No Pants Subway Ride | New York Daily News - YouTube.

Recap of questions:
Have you tried e.l.f. EyesLipsFace Cosmetics?
What brand(s) of vegan cruelty free makeup do you like best?
Should I participate in a No trousers event?
Which briefs do you like best?
Will you remember to leave a link to your blog below?
Thank you in advance for your comments!

Please feel free to leave links/URLs to your fashion, beauty and lifestyle blogs along with your COMMENTS BELOW

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

Thank You To Commenters, Rant On Discriminatory Social Media Censorship and YouTube Slander

     I had intended this post to be a lingerie review of various pairs of women's full coverage underwear and my most recent fashion hauls. Instead I have gotten so pissed off at being repeatedly discriminated against, slandered and censored by social media corporations, that I decided to merely thank my commenters - and then go on a rant about discrimination and censorship - about the consciousless social media companies that have gotten into bed with prudes, bigots, haters and trolls - and about the avarice and greed of said social media companies trumping their consciences.
      Before I get really rolling on my rant against discrimination and censorship by social media, let me first thank my commenters.
THANK YOU FOR COMMENTING to all the Fbloggers, Lbloggers, Bbloggers and Fashionistas who commented on my last blog post titled: Shadowline and Victorias Secret Lingerie Fashion OOTDs and Reviews with Dressing Room Selfie Photos and Video with Blooper!  
Fashionista editor Couture Carrie of CC Loves, of Couture Carrie, and of Bikinis and Martinis Twitter @CoutureCarrie. Carrie loves spotting and sharing fashion trends and style with her readers;  
Fashionista, DIY, thrifting inspired blogger from the Door peninsula of WisconsinIndy of The Fabulosity Factor and Twitter @Fab_Factor;  
The poetic, inspiring, dancing phenomenon RaeAbigael of RAELLARINA- The Ballerina on Fire and Raellarina's Channel - YouTube and Twitter @RaeAbigael;
The beautiful Camila Faria of Não Me Mande Flores Twitter @_CamilaF_ who blogs about internet love and all the lovely things one can send as an expression of it other than flowers; 
The pretty and popular fashion blogger from Poland Ania Zarzycka of the fashion blog Fashion with blog photos taken by her sister Klaudia; 
The student fashion and lifestyle blogger from the Philippines Bernadeth G. of Miss Beatrix  
The colourful queen of vintage and nominee for Vintage Personality at the National Vintage Awards 2014 Vix of Vintage Vixen, Twitter @Vintage_Vix66, YouTube Vix Brearley, and curator (with Jon) at Kinky Mellon's Retro Boutique
The sometimes controversial and always thought provoking fashionista, photographer, artist and philosopher Peet and her blogging dog Leos, a.k.a. Mister Fartz of the blog For Peet's Sake and Twitter @4PeetsSake
The acclaimed multiple award winning fashion bloggers Tara Twitter @Englishian and Jade Twitter @Girlyougotstyle  both of the UK fashion and style blog THE STYLE RAWR! Twitter   @TheStyleRawr
The Houston Fashion blogger, music lover and fitness amateur Malibu Mara of the blog .Malibu Mara. YouTube MalibuMaraTV and Twitter @MalibuMara (Mara left her comment related to my Victoria's Secret/Shadowlinne post in the comments to my post titled: "Fbloggers Lingerie Fashion OOTDs and Reviews of Vanity Fair Ravissant Full Briefs"; 
Fashion blogger and online marketing intern Ina R. a.k.a. Carina of Bad Taste Toast from Düsseldorf, Germany;
#SocialBlogger organiser of #Fbloggers #Lbloggers and #Bbloggers from Yorkshire, England, lover of dresses and YouTube, and glamourous Food Stock Control Manager Corinne C. of, Twitter  @bloggerforums and YouTube Corinne C at;  
THANK YOU to everyone who follows, favourites and Retweets me on Twitter, follows me on Twitter, this blog, my YouTube channel, and who have left comments on earlier posts but whom I haven't mentioned here. 
My apologies for the length of this post. I doubt many people will take the time to read it all and check the links. At least there are some images to look at and (hopefully) some embeded videos to watch. Please feel free to leave links to your blogs with your comments. Thanks.
Here are a few of the blouses and briefs I had intended to review in June and July before the fucktards at YouTube wrongfully slandered me, censored/removed one of my videos and slandered me, issuing a "strike" against my account in a brazen high-handed display of sex discrimination and malice motivated by bigotry:  
And many other briefs and blouses I never ordered because I was too discouraged by having giant social media corporations censoring my photos and videos, condemning them to the Orwellian "Memory Hole", and replacing links to them with lies about me and my reviews. 

     It's a real shame when social media escalates from enabling haters and trolls to actively slandering, censoring and deleting the posts or even the accounts of the victims of the discrimination and abuse, all at the behest of said haters and trolls. Social media are well aware that false-flagging trolls have commandeered their automated flagging activated "moderation" (censorship) programmes.
DISCLAIMER: I am not a lawyer. I highly recommend consulting an attorney or getting legal help prior to suing a large social media corporation for discrimination and slander, but it is important that we make some noise and say NO to censorship.
     There have been plenty of people who have complained about wrongfully censored YouTube videos in the past, and YouTube has failed to address their censorship and slander problems. Most other other social media sites have failed to address their flawed and often discriminatory censorship problems as well. 

     The title of this SiteProNews article pretty much says it all: "YouTube Spits in the Face of its Users by Refusing to Address Their False Flagging Problem". 
Quoting from the article: "Let me say that again. FALSE FLAGGING is when a video has NOT broken any rules, but still gets flagged; and the owner of the video gets a strike against their account, even though they’ve done nothing wrong."
The article gives Google's phone number is  1-650-253-0000 and YouTube's (Google) fax number as 1-650-253-0000 but says, in essence, that calling or faxing the numbers is futile because Google simply doesn't care and won't talk to you.  
     There  was an article in the Harvard Law Review titled "The Brave New World of Social Media Censorship - How "terms of service" abridge free speech"", Facebook and Google set out to become and have become "common carriers"
. The article does acknowledge that search engines should be categorized as common carriers and therefore prohibited from censorship. The time is long past due for social media giants like Google, Facebook, Flickr, etc. along with the internet service providers to be classified as common carriers and brought to account criminally when they discriminate. In my opinion until they cease and desist from discrimination we should shame them wherever we can in the media, sue them civilly whenever practicable, and make a stink about their censorship to politicians who aren't bought and paid for (if there are any).
     Facebook's "Community Standards" page states that they do not permit individuals " attack others based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, disability or medical condition", yet Facebook and Google, hypocritically, have done the very things to their users that they prohibit individuals from doing themselves. Facebook and Google routinely censor people based on the above mentioned factors, i.e.: Censoring womens' nipples but not mens', and censoring men in full coverage panties but not women in sheer panties or with bared buttocks. 
     The claims made (pretexts used) by social media monopolies in the course of censoring unpopular speech and expression off the internet are usually that the videos in question somehow violate their "Terms of Service" or "Community Guidelines". Countless people have had the viewing their videos restricted and labeled with a vague and slanderous message, often asserting a specious reference to "Terms of Service" or "Community Guidelines". 
     It is my belief that YouTube, Google and Facebook have all repeatedly caved in to demands for censorship by the "American Family Association" , the "Family Research Council" - both of which are organizations designated as hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center.  These groups (A.F.A. and F.R.C.) are rabidly homophobic and transphobic. In June the National Coalition Against Censorship published a blog post noting that: "Some groups, like the American Family Association, rely on obscenity law to demand the removal of artwork with partial nudity."
     Here are a few examples of Social Media wrongfully using their "Terms of Service" as a pretext to censor underwear and justify sex discrimination
     Facebook went so far as to censor a photograph of a nude statue in a post about censorship by the American Civil Liberties Union. The ACLU asked "Why Was Our Post About Censorship Censored?" in their post titled: "Naked Statue Reveals One Thing: Facebook Censorship Needs Better Appeals Process". Think that was just an accident? I think not. Remember George Bush's Attorney General John Ashcroft ordering demanding that the breasts of statues be covered up? There are scads of pseudo-religious fanatical haters and wackos out there who apparently believe we should all have been born with clothes on and that babies should be blindfolded while breastfeeding. 
     The censoring of photographs of statues seems to be their standard operating procedure. Priscilla Frank of the Huffington Post may have thought it was funny in her article titled "Artist Hilariously Censors The Louvre's Nude Statues For Facebook (SFW)", but I'm not laughing.

     Facebook outright lies about the fact that they censor people: In an article in Facebook was quoted as claiming "We've always allowed breast feeding photos". Shortly thereafter they flagged a breast-feeding photo saying "Please Review the Community Standards. Your Page, group or event was reported to Facebook. After reviewing the report, we determined one or more photos or posts don't follow the Facebook Community Standards". Clearly Facebook practices sex discrimination, lies in order to try to justify that discrimination, and lies about having done so. George Orwell's novel "1984" was prescient, and what was revealed in the movie Orwell Rolls In His Grave by Robert Kane Pappas was only the tip of the iceberg.

The Center for Research on Globalization published an article titled: "The Secret Playbook of Social Media Censors - The 'Counter Reset'". The government actively employs sock puppets to spread "black propaganda" (lies) as this year 2006 BBC News article foretold. 

     Sadly those who seek objective truth on the internet have a very difficult time finding it, and the task of truth-finding is getting more difficult as hopes for "Net Neutrality" seem to be fading away.

The ACLU has posted articles titled: "What Is Net Neutrality? | American Civil Liberties Union" and "Net Neutrality: Securing Equality Online | American Civil Liberties Union". did an op-ed titled: "Dumping Net Neutrality: 'Fast' lane to censorship & Obama's biggest letdown - RT Op-Edge"
     At the time of this writing there was a Wikipedia article titled "Internet censorship in the United States". That article noted that the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) have both been found to unconstitutionally violate the freedom of speech and of the press guaranteed under the 1st Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
     There have been more than two dozen news articles in the Huffington Post on Media Censorship. Over two years ago Washington'sBlog did a post titled Top Media Websites Caught Censoring Controversial Content. Not only has the censorship has gotten much worse since then, but some social media giants are using anti-competative tactics that clearly violate antitrust laws. 

I couldn't help but ask myself: Could or has Google's coercive bundling of YouTube/Google+/Gmail become a much worse antitrust violation than the bundling of Windows with their browser Internet Explorer that wound up costing Microsoft millions of dollars in fines? Surely Google's coercive tactics in attempting to bundle YouTube, gmail, their browser, Blogger, Google search and more into a single Google+ account must violate antitrust laws. Have they become too big to prosecute?
A article "Google plus antitrust and privacy risk revealed In New York Times stopthegfiles" noted:  "Being required to sign into one product in order to access a previously independent one raises anti-trust issues".
     Facebook is noted for operating well outside the envelope and relying heavily on its lawyers to defend its practices. Perhaps seeing how Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg have reaped billions of dollars per year from their monopolistic and datamining schemes (whilst their companies pay only millions of dollars in slap-on-the-wrist fines for monopolistic behavior and datamining) has proved too tempting for Google. Perhaps Google executives are letting avarice convince them to drop the word "Don't" from their former motto "Don't be evil", thus converting the motto to "Be evil" in hopes of becoming much more super-rich than they are.
Unfortunately it appears their avarice has annihilated whatever common sense they had and they have disregarded the technical advice they used to give in Google Help. Changing account names, titles and URLs screws up websites and accounts and hurts search results. Their CPU hungry graphics and scripts slow loading to a crawl, cause excessive buffering and synchronisation problems, browser freezing, and severely impair user experience. The hacking of browsers and disabling of private browsing to enable data-mining by the likes of DoubleClick does not seem to have slowed despite Google having to pay $17 million dollars for hacking Safari web browsers. The consumers whose browsers were hacked and whose data was compromised were never compensated - so where's my payment? Only Apple received the proceeds from the slap-on-the-wrist.
The hacking of Safari browsers defeated Safari's "Private Browsing" feature and destroyed anonymity. The Electronic Freedom Foundation Asked Virginia's Supreme Court to Take Anonymous Speech Seriously, noting that anonymous speech, including in customer reviews, are necessary for a free society. What Google's Doubleclick did was even worse that destroying anonymity. It enables Doubleclick to track Apple Computer users browsing habits across the web.. They then facilitated third parties to "...see which account on a social network is yours. They can then just go to your profile page, record its contents, and add them to your file. Of the 12 social networks surveyed in this paper, only one (Orkut) didn't leak any personally identifying information to third parties." Google's Doubleclick is far from alone in the rush to invade the privacy of and data-mine its users. Now, according to the SociaTimes, there has been a Global Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Facebook in Europe for tracking its users on external sites and aiding the NSA's "surveillance and data-mining program, Prism".
     On July 23rd, 2014 I came across an article titled A T & T, Chernin Group close to deal to buy YouTube network Fullscreen -tech blog | Reuters. If ever there were a case for declaring YouTube a common carrier, demanding Net Neutrality and that the anti-discrimination requirements of United States code and the Constitution prevail rather than YouTube's arbitrarily interpreted, vague and changeable "Terms of Service", the potential acquisition by AT & T should make the case for non-discrimination crystal clear.
     Sadly if the FCC fails to enforce net neutrality, bandwidth will go to the highest bidders, and little schnooks like us will have to put up with excessive buffering and poor internet service. Senator Elizabeth Warren has been fighting a lonely battle trying making net neutrality enforceable. Wish her luck.
Here's an Adorable Song by Emma Blackery (From Emma Blackery's YouTube Channel) titled:   "My  Thoughts on Google+".

     So far Google seems to have turned a deaf ear to criticism both of its discriminatory censorship and of its coercive attempts to make YouTubers get Google+ accounts, disregarding all of the following:
An article by VioletBlue: Forced Google Plus integration on YouTube backfires;
YouTubers give revamp thumbs down |;

YouTube co-founder Jawed Karin slammed Google for requiring a Google + account to comment on YouTube. asking: "Why the fuck do I need a google account to comment on YouTube?" He subsequently changed the icon on his YouTube channel to an image saying "google+ SUCKS". YouTube then censored (removed) Jawed Karin's icon!. Having seen that Google has a turned a deaf ear to YouTube co-founder Jawed Karim, it would seem the chances of any of us little schnooks getting their attention are somewhere between slim and none.

Is Google violating its settlement with FTC in the course of its bundling integration of Google+ and YouTube?

Google is already being investigated by the European Commission's antitrust unit for anti-competitive tactics. and the business community has taken note:
Google Plus Creates Uproar Over Forced Integration |;
Feds to Launch Antitrust Probe of Google -;

     It would appear to me that from Google's point of view money trumps both free speech and privacy as well. Here are a few more articles that I feel illustrate that:
From articles in The Guardian: Google pays 37 US States 17 million settlement to US States and a 22.5 million fine to FTC for hacking Mac Safari via DoubleClick. Here's an article in appleinsider on the settlement. Note how the users themselves were never paid a dime for having had their computers and privacy invaded. A few more articles:

Via Sarah Silbert  at Engadget:  Google to pay $17 million as penalty for unauthorized web tracking in Safari.  Where's my compensation?
From Could a Google+ security flaw take down your YouTube page with no warning?
Google's recent YouTube fiasco isn't just about privacy | USA Today
Google's Relentless Campaign to Make Google+ Work Becomes YouTube's Problem  |

     Google's business tactics, straying far from its former "Don't be  evil" motto, have earned the company some well deserved scorn:

Google's tactics in trying to snooker people into signing up for a Google+ account were satirised with a Washington Post article on YouTube/Google+'s bait and switch campaign featuring a nofollow"> bait and switch baby GIF done via

I enjoyed watching the video Wilhelmina: Show Your True Self - YouTube

I would love to be able to say YouTube, Google, Flickr, Facebook et al apologise when the discriminatory and wrongful censorship they have perpetrated is brought to their attention, but they don't and I can not. These internet behemoths tend to ignore even legal demands to cease and desist from slandering people. It is that inclination to ignore requests to cease and desist from slander after the facts are brought to their attention that resulted in Google losing in court when an Australian man sued them for defamation.
     It is not just photos and videos that are being wrongfully censored here in the supposedly once free United States of America. The NCAC ran an article noting that the American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression is Preparing for Banned Books Week 2014 (September 21-27). The most challenged/top censored book on the American Library Association's annual list this year is Dav Pilkey's "Captain Underpants".
       Some bloggers and YouTubers have fought back and shamed Instagram into apologising for censoring their underwear photos:
     Instagram apologised to Meghan Tonjes after she launched a public campaign and posted a video documenting the discrimination. The video was titled: Dear Instagram. (F.A.T) @Instagram - YouTube. It's had over 700,000 views. Here is her video embedded:
     Thanks to YouTube's insistence on having a Google+ account to comment most of the "top" comments to the video have been made by trolls (Google+ enables trolls and discourages thoughtful commenters). 
     Here are some examples of the kind comments Google+ ENCOURAGES by making them top comments: 
     Mih Machado: "Your concepts are all fucked up. Don't lie to yourself, you are SICK your body is a piece of shit" 
     Antonello Mei "Shut up and go to the gym."
     Jaja banks "she a hoe" 
     MrJusttestinghere "Stay off social media. Problem solved." 
     MartinLara1947 "Well said" 
     I don't think it's a stretch to speculate that the troll sock-puppets that Google+ elevates to top comment status are indicative of the kind of entities that are false-flagging videos to get them taken down.  
     Instagram did not learn their lesson. Instagram wound up having to issue another apology and reinstate the account of Samm Newman who had posted photos of herself in her underwear. Samm had to take her case to her local News station in order to make her case, as social media sites are notoriously unresponsive to complaints of wrongful censorship. There was a lot of press coverage about the censorship, apology and reinstatement. Social media would do well to take heed of articles like this one in GirlTalkHQ about censorship hurting body image. Too often it takes a lot of bad press to get media giants to back off individual cases of wrongful censorship. 
     Here are a few more articles about Samm Newman's underwear photos being censored: 
     Do you think Google and YouTube censor everyone equally? Think again. As Meghan Tonjes stated, women who are slim or pleasantly shaped can generally flaunt their bare bottoms as much as they want. 
     YouTube employs different levels of high-handed censorship, One of their most often employed censorship tools is "restricting" viewing of the videos. Whilst Google's YouTube claims that they are restricting the videos to over-18 viewers, they do not operate the way most over eighteen sites do. Most adult sites merely require the would be viewer to click a button under a statement stating that they are over 18. Unlike those sites, Google's YouTube unethically requires viewers to have an account and sign in, presumably to try to increase the number of people they can claim as account holders whilst also keeping a record of their interests.

     Google also censors and/or restricts images of me male modeling (back view) ladies full coverage panties. Capricious and arbitrary censorship by social media corporations is completely out of hand. According to the Wikipedia article on arbitrary censorship, blogger Mike Linksvayer "posited that free content licenses such as the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike are voluntary repeals of one's ability to  arbitrarily claim the right to prohibit the distribution, modification or commercialization of a creative work." in his post titled "Retaining the right to censor is an act of hate". He in turn links to the Electronic Frontier Foundation article Say No to Online Censorship!

     Rihanna's 'S&M' Video was Restricted by YouTube but the video, "...poking fun at the ball-gag wearing media" but MTV, to it's credit, chose to run the video unedited.
     As the American Civil Liberties Union points out in their page on Internet Censorship: "... freedom of speech online continues to be threatened..." "...the government has no right to censor protected speech on the Internet, and it cannot reduce adults to hearing and seeing only speech that the government considers suitable for children."
     Unfortunately both governments and corporations are blocking, filtering and restricting sites and content broadly and arbitrarily. The Open Rights Group asks "Is your site blocked by UK ISP filters?"

     After links and directly typed to this blog at were intercepted and redirected by my service provider I started wondering whether my blog URL gets blocked by other ISPs and how much of what I see is being filtered.


I wondered whether there have been updates for these articles on Widespread Hijacking of Search Traffic in the United States and An update on Paxfire and search redirection.
Oct. 1st, 2014 UPDATE on ISP censorship via intercept (images):
The following intercept censorship event occurred when, while already viewing my own blog at  I clicked on the title of this blog post at These intercepts by my service provider have been occurring more and more frequently. Something has to be done to stop this kind of out-of-control internet censorship.



     Occasionally when those who have been censored happen to own media outlets they manage to be heard about it. On 4 July 2014 Mail Online published an article titled: "Google backs down in censorship row".
     Apparently, however, Google's YouTube has nothing but contempt for the bloggers who use their platforms.

     Eight of my YouTube videos are currently "restricted", requiring people to "sign in" to view them, and two of my videos were removed and replaced with slanderous statements about me and my videos. Although the preview icon for the "Featured" video on my YouTube channel (Mister_Panty_Buns-loves-having-Hanes-Women's-Nylon-Panties-on) is visible you cannot watch it on YouTube without signing in because it is "restricted". It can, I believe, still be watched embedded here without signing in.
UPDATE: In addition to slandering me, lying about my customer lingerie review videos, censoring my videos and restricting the viewing of them, YouTube has stooped to censoring the fact of the popularity of the "Featured Video" on my YouTube channel, by artificially manipulating the view-count downward AGAIN.  Here is the YouTube video embedded:
     So far one doesn't have to sign in to watch it on VEOH TV

Watch MOV-Mister_Panty_Buns-loves-having-Hanes_Her_Way-Womens-Nylon-Brief-Panties-on.AVI in Entertainment  |  View More Free Videos Online at
     Here is a photo of me in the blouse and panty outfit of the day that YouTube restricted the viewing of.
     My customer lingerie review video taken modeling this lingerie fashion outfit of the day featuring full coverage briefs and no sexual content whatsoever was restricted by YouTube!
     Compare that image with the video thumbnails of women in lingerie videos that YouTube does not restrict, showing them as "you may also like" to people who view my video titled "MOV-Customer-Lingerie-Review-Vanity_Fair-Ravissant-full_briefs.AVI".



Being seen in public in ones underwear, in photos, videos, in newspapers, magazines, on billboards, and on television has become commonplace and yet some Social Media sites still cave in to pressure to censor it, particularly if the wearer is overweight or if their gender doesn't match the common gender association of their underwear.
The many underwear in public events, some of which I have written about on this blog, are generally not censored as much. Here s a list of some of those events. You can read about some of them in my earlier posts:
The No Pants Subway Ride In January;
Cupid's Undie Run "in your bedroom best on Valentine's Weekend.";
The Shamrockin' Underwear Run kicking off the Saint Patrick's Day weekend in the Crescent City New Orleans; 
2014 Underwear Run in Central Park, New York City on August 1st, 2014 starting at 7:30 PM;
National Underwear Day. organised by Freshpair. Last year's event was on August 5th, 2014 in Times Square in Manhattan;
Here's an article on the Undie Run - Wikipedia and their website


     Celebrities in their underwear rarely get censored. The Frisky published photos of 26 Celebs In Sheer Clothing. Among the 26 celebrities in the media spotlight photographed in their  sheer couture were:
Katy Perry,
Gaia Weiss and
Candice Boucher.

     The list of celebrities out in public and on stage in lingerie is a long one and includes Lady gaga, Miley Cyrus, Kim Kardashian, Madonna, Rihanna, Shakira, and many many many more, but does this cause haters and prudes to hesitate from false flagging everyday people from doing lingerie reviews or posting underwear selfies? Nooooooo. The haters, bigots and prudes never rest from trying to make social media an instrument in implementing their own myopic desire for controlling everyone else. Unfortunately social media sites all too often accede to their demands. That doesn't stop the supermarket tabloids from publishing the photos though. (Example: Daily news article titled "Kelly Osborn bares her bottom in racy thong photo posted to Instagram" ).
      The NY  Daily News and published this "cover art" photograph of Nicki Minaj's bare bottom in an article about the delay of Nicki's single 'Anaconda'. The same photo showing Nicki Minaj's bare bottom was featured in a Feministing article titled "Micki Minaj's butt and the politics of black women's sexuality". Nicki Minaj posted this same photo showing her entire bare bottom as the profile icon for her Twitter, @NICKIMINAJ. She also posted it on Instagram and received over 300,000 "Likes" on the photo. The photo featuring Nicki's bottom was also featured in the Billboard article Nicki Minaj Previews Syeamy 'Anaconda' Video, Unleashes Full Track. So how is it that a man wearing ladies full brief panties with his entire bottom covered gets censored? There can be no other plausible explanation other than blatant bigoted sex discrimination.

.jpg (not restricted).   
      The Nicki Minaj - Anaconda Official Music Video Snippet uploaded by Nicki Minaj Tv
shows Nicki Minaj twerking in black briefs.
     Meanwhile, YouTube issued a "STRIKE" against my account for the customer review video of the full coverage shapewear panty brief featured in in my post titled: "Lbloggers Fbloggers OOTD and Review of Maidenform Flexees Shapewear Panty Briefs". The full coverage Maidenform Flexees Shaper Panty in the video that YouTube issued a "Strike" against my account for covered my bottom completely. The conclusion after comparison is inescapable. YouTube's censorship of my video was a hate-motivated act of blatant sex-discrimination as defined in the United States Code. Even if they acted at the behest of someone else they are at this point an accessory at least and acting in bad faith. Since I already requested that they "Cease and Decist" from slandering me, pointed out the fact that what they  are saying is false and they have declined to desist, they can be sued for that continuing slander. The high-handed manner in which social media corporations treat their users is unconscionable.

UPDATE #2 An August 20th 2014 Billboard article Nicki Minaj's Smoking-Hot 'Anaconda' Video Arrives Online | Billboard features the same pinup photo of Nicki Minaj  along with the embedded video Nicki Minaj - Anaconda - YouTube.

     YouTube is guilty of SEX DISCRIMINATION.

     Despite the rant against discriminatory social media censorship you can still find me (at the moment anyhow) at:;;;;;

I stopped uploading my lingerie review photos and videos to my account on Photobucket (also gobbled up by Google) due to unpredictable, arbitrary and wrongful censorship.
     I had considered uploading this image to Photobucket

to replace a photo that Photobucket censored (of me male-modeling  Vanity Fair turquoise full briefs).
UPDATE: Jezebel published an article titled: "Nicki Minaj's Ass, Bent on World Domination, Gets Censored by Apple". The article asks: "Still, do black women need parental advisory stickers for the beach too?" At least she didn't have her video taken down and a strike issued against her account the way YouTube wrongfully did to me.
Another UPDATE: as of September 30th, 2014 Nicki Minaj's video Ananconda on YouTube is still not restricted, and has over 215 million views and over 1,100,000 "Likes", whilst my video Mister_Panty_Buns-loves-having-Hanes-Women's-Nylon-Panties-on is not only restricted, but YouTube has still refused to remove the "strike" wrongfully placed against my account for the video embedded (and censored) from my post titled: "Lbloggers Fbloggers OOTD and Review of Maidenform Flexees Shapewear Panty Briefs". 

Please feel free to leave links to your fashion, beauty, lifestyle and social media related blogs along with your COMMENTS BELOW